All the tragic gun violence-related events that took place recently and not so recently led not only to grief but to all sorts of speculation on all levels. The topic has become so widely discussed that everyone has something to say on it: So, given the actuality of the issue, it is only logical that students are often given assignments to write gun control essay, to investigate this pressing question, and to share their opinions in this regard. While everybody agrees that mass shootings should not happen, the gun control as a means to cope with this problem is a controversial approach that polarizes our society.
The convention speeches by James and Sarah Brady were filled with moving stories of their personal suffering. While the impacts described on both sides of the issue do exist, the crucial question underlying all gun-control laws is: What is their net effect?
Are more lives lost or saved? Do they deter crime or encourage it? Anecdotal evidence obviously cannot resolve this debate. To provide a more systematic answer, I recently completed a study of one type of gun control law-laws on concealed handguns, also known as "shall-issue" laws.
Thirty-one states give their citizens the right to carry concealed handguns if they do not have a criminal record or a history of significant mental illness. Our findings are dramatic. Our most conservative estimates show that by adopting shall-issue laws, states reduced murders by 8.
If those states that did not permit concealed handguns in had permitted them back then, citizens might have been spared approximately 1, murders, 4, rapes, 60, aggravated assaults and 12, robberies. To put it even more simply Criminals, we found, respond rationally to deterrence threats.
The benefit of concealed handguns are not limited to just those who carry them or use them in self-defense. The very fact that these weapons are concealed keeps criminals uncertain as to whether a potential victim will be able to defend himself with lethal force.
The possibility that anyone might be carrying a gun makes attacking everyone less attractive; unarmed citizens in effect "free-ride" on their pistol packing fellows. Our study further found that while some criminals avoid potentially violent crimes after concealed-handgun laws were passed, they do not necessarily give up the criminal life altogether.
Some switch to crimes in which the rise of confronting an armed victim is much lower. Indeed, the downside of concealed-weapons laws is that while Violent crime rates fall, property offenses like larceny e.
This is certainly a substitution that the country can live with. Our study also provided some surprising information. Concealed handguns also appear to help women more than men. Murder rates decline when either sex carries more guns, but the effect is especially pronounced when women are considered separately.
An additional woman carrying a concealed handgun reduces the murder rate for women by about three to four times more than an additional armed man reduces the murder rate for men. Victims of violent crime are generally physically weaker than the criminals who prey on them. Allowing a woman to defend herself with a concealed handgun makes a larger difference in her ability to defend herself than the change created by providing a man with a handgun.
Guns are the great equalizer between the weak and the vicious. At the Democratic convention, President Clinton played up his proposed expansion of the Brady Law, which by making it harder for men convicted of domestic violence to obtain guns is designed to reduce crime against women.
We also collected data on whether owners of concealed handguns are more likely to use them in committing violent crimes. More thanconcealed- handgun licenses were issued between October 1, and December 31,but only five violent crimes involving permitted pistols were committed in this period.
And none of these resulted in fatalities. What about minor disputes such as traffic accidents? Are legal owners of concealed handguns more likely to use them in such situations?
In 31 states, some of which have had concealed weapons laws for decades, there is only one recorded incident earlier this year in Texas in which a concealed handgun, was used in a shooting following an accident. Even in that one case, a grand jury found that the shooting was in self-defense: The shooter was being beaten by the other driver.
And what about accidental deaths? The number of accidental handgun deaths each year is fewer than Our estimates imply that if the states without "shall issue" laws were to adopt them, the increase in accidental handgun deaths would be at most nine more deaths per year.
This is small indeed when compared to the at least 1, murders that would be avoided. While no single study is likely to end the debate on concealed handguns, ours provides the first systematic national evidence.While support for strict gun-control laws usually bas been strongest in large cities, where crime rates are highest, that's precisely where right-to-carry laws have produced the largest drops in violent crimes.
The Causes and Effects of Gun Control By Harrison Hardin over , people are shot with guns in the United States every year 72% of all killings involve a gun. Cause and effect essay on gun control. A cause and effect essay takes a certain event (existing or suggested) and investigates its consequences.
Here, you can, for example, talk about what would total ban on individual firearm possession lead . An example of the outline for a cause-and-effect essay about the problems of loosening the gun control laws.
I. Thesis: The loosening of gun control laws leads to more deaths A. Makes it easier for obtaining weapons that lead to shootings. One of the biggest issues involving gun control is directly correlated to its effects on crime and murder.
Those who support the gun control movement will claim that imposing stricter firearm laws, violent crimes such as murder will decline because of having the availability of firearms curtailed.
Gun Control in the United States - Cause and Effect. 7 Pages Words November The Causes and Effects of Gun Control in the United States Then those who oppose gun control known as pro-gun activists argue firearms are a necessity to: hunting game in the wild, self-defense to a dangerous criminal, and it is part of the American.